Exercise 3

Parodies are one of the most entertaining and popular forms of network culture.  They are inspired by mass popular culture, such as movies, t.v. shows, and music, and they represent the creativity of multiple individuals and portray multiple meanings for each audience.  The fact that the original structured media can be manipulated to have other meanings than what the original owner intended and the popularity and interest that it draws from a large audience shows the importance of participatory culture and the effectiveness it has in generating interest.  This is imperative for our group in generating the interest of an audience for our short term goals.  Of course the idea of the parody is to be a hilarious misinterpretation of existing popular media, and our topic is one where a humorous approach would be inappropriate.  However, the pull that participatory culture has on people would prove an important factor in our project.

My specific parody youtube video is a voice over of the popular Disney song “Let it Go”, and the audience being those who have heard or know of this song.  The original song is massively popular and so the author of the parody chose that song knowing that people would be interested in their version since the original is so well known.  The message of the parody concerns studying for finals and also the crude title of the parody all serves to target a younger audience, an audience which is most likely to be on youtube the most.  The author therefore displays Ka-knowledge in basing their digital rhetoric on their target audience.  This goes to show that our group needs to consider the audience we are trying to reach out to.  Parodies and humor are probably not the best way for us to reach out considering the sensitivity of our topic.  Instead we should try for ways to evoke sympathy through somber emotions and heartfelt stories so that our audience truly sees our issue as something that affects them as well.

That transition from saturation to occupation is also key and seen in my parody example.  By viewing the video you can also see that other people have taken the parody and continued to make their own parodies of the same song, granted with a lot less viewing success but they are there nonetheless.  In showing the possibility of what can be created using a combination of existing media and original creativity, the author has inspired other people to try making something of their own.  That’s exactly what we want to accomplish in our project which is to inspire people to just think about how our issue effects their lives and recognize that there is a problem.  The daily challenges we present are an attempt to get people inspired to think about about the issue of mental illness and connect it with their day to day lives.

The point of the parody video is just to convey the author’s personal thoughts and ideas through existing media, so one sees the effects of Clicktivism in the “likes” section of Youtube but overall there is no negative effect since the fact that many people are viewing the video is what matters.  However, the interaction that my group is looking for for our project requires us to stay away from simply asking for people “like” our efforts.  Interaction is key, so every video we post or every challenge we present is an attempt at inspiring more sacrifice from our audience instead of just clicktivism.

Exercise #2

Literacy

Literacy for me is experienced through school.  I depend on it for many things besides the “purpose” that school is supposed to fulfill.  Many things also affect my outlook of my connection with literacy, mostly family as they are the ones who I connect my schooling with the most.  The meaning to me changes from school year to school year as future goals change and the situations in which I’m getting my education changes.

Another class, another 50 minutes of battling the desire to switch on standby mode.  The material comes and goes, I’ll look at it later  because today is not the day.  But it’s so much harder to get it later. I’ve done this time and time again, I need to focus.  The grades must get better, it will mean so much to them. It’s the least I can do.

school-work_o_863152

How many classes do I have today? There’s too many, too much to do, too little time.  How can I do well in everything? There is no such thing as a throw away class.  I wonder if they think I’m doing well.  I won’t disappoint, I have to listen.  What’s going on on Friday again? 45 more minutes to go.

715-funny-joke-pictures-12

I can do this, I study and I work hard.  Why is this not making any sense? It’s okay, there’s so much time.  I’ll be fine, I’ll be fine. 40 minutes to go.

Orality

I believe orality has significant differences when experienced through different mediums.  Conversations through technology fell different than face to face encounters.  Even a phone call creates a noticeable screen between individuals where the conversation is warped and different meanings are interpreted from what originally was intended.  Unfortunately, the convenience of technology makes it hard to communicate in other ways.

I need to talk to you, can you Skype me? I know it’s late but I’d rather not do this over a text.  Yes everything is okay.  Stop everything is fine, don’t worry! Then just pick up the phone.

miscom

I’m sorry about last week, I didn’t mean for anything to sound like that.  Of course, I just want to talk real quick while we’re here.  You’re not busy are you? Oh, okay. Yeah, call me tonight.

I’m sorry I missed your calls, something came up at work! Can we talk now? I didn’t mean to leave you hanging…. Alright, I guess I’ll call you tomorrow.

Electracy

Sometimes I’m glad I don’t play professional sports.

It’s like I’m actually there!! Wait…

The online social sphere is one of the greatest achievements of mankind.  Experiences from all over the world of virtually anything you can imagine is accessible via the internet.  You can experience all of these via the online community, but always remember you are only truly understanding these in very basic forms.  The connections that the online social sphere makes are only surface level connections that we must understand do not give us the full experience of what we find online that meant something to those who posted the original material.

 

Project 1 Reflection

Looking back over my project I realize that composing an “ideal” self-portrait through online social media proves to be a difficult task when trying to describe specific characteristics.  The nature of many sources of online networking and social media is to express multiple sensations and relate to varying audiences and through individual viewers, mean many specific things to these individuals.  When applying my sources of online media to my project I couldn’t help but see multiple connections I made with each of them to the point where the specific purpose of these sources seemed insignificant compared to the multitude of other meanings they held for me.  In realizing this, I understand that the “self-portrait” purpose of this project definitely requires the target audience to be the individual creating the self-portrait.  If I look at my self-portrait and still see how the social media that is supposed to be describing specific categories also describes n enormous multitude of other characteristics, how is an outside individual supposed to feel all these exact things?  My view of the whole project is that every person that looks in on the self-portrait I created actually sees a variation of their own and in no way will they ever be the same and that is the nature of online social connections.  Online there is no guideline or structure explaining how one is supposed to process information.  It’s just there and it’s up to the user to decide what that data means to them, making the point again from my last post that we are still far from creating a machine that can mirror the human consciousness.  I see this as another reason why the online public sphere is so attractive, no matter what there will always be something that an individual can make a connection with and it will only be clicks away.

Parody Blogging

While discussing this week’s topics, I found I couldn’t really grasp the idea of “parody blogging”.  I’d seen many examples of parodies on the web, usually through youtube and gif sites, but I have never seen a parody blog.  What I’ve found that defines them is distinguishing arguments from argumentation.  Roberts-Miller talks more about it in his article “Parody Blogging and Call of the Real”.  It explains that argumentation in blogs is used as a persuasive method which is in contrast to arguments, as they are opinions of misinterpretation.  This applies to all blogs and is what separates them from other forms of social online media.  In this way actually I see parody blogs connecting the rhetoric of blogs to that of other social online media since they use both elements of misinterpretation and persuasion.  However I think this depends on the author of the blog in whether the “parody” is an example of argumentation or arguments.  One parody blog I looked up contained content that had video games as a subject.  What I saw as argumentation was the author wrote from the perspective of a game designer within a game company who was responsible for design decisions.  However I saw a political parody blog who’s author used “silly” arguments in his writing and used no or little clear elements of argumentation.  In this way I see that parody blogs can lean from either argumentation to arguments but nonetheless are still the most rhetorically similar to other online social media out of weblogs.